Ten Thousand Bombs: Washington Restocks Riyadh’s War Before Congress Has Finished Arguing About Its Centrifuges
A $5.75 billion package of guided bombs and tank engines cleared the State Department on Friday. The same building is defending a nuclear deal to a Congress that must now vote on both.
On Friday, September 4, the State Department notified Congress of two potential Foreign Military Sales to Saudi Arabia: 10,004 Joint Direct Attack Munition Extended Range kits, with just over 5,000 BLU-111 and 5,000 BLU-117 bombs to mate them to, in a package valued at about $5 billion, and 60 AGT-1500 engines for the Kingdom’s Abrams tanks. Reporting puts the combined value at $5.75 billion. Boeing builds the kits. The State Department’s stated justification, carried by AFP, is that the sale “will improve Saudi Arabia’s airborne defence capability to counter current and future regional threats, strengthen its homeland defence, and improve interoperability with systems operated by US forces and other Gulf region partners”. Breaking Defense adds the operational subtext: the Kingdom is stockpiling precision munitions depleted by seven months of conflict with Iran, which a CSIS estimate says has run down inventories across the region.
The timing is the story. Two days earlier, Representative Brad Sherman called for a Joint Resolution of Disapproval against the US-Saudi 123 nuclear agreement, and the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that the enrichment pathway in that text “risks bolstering congressional opposition”. The arms package also requires lawmakers not to block it. Washington has therefore put two Saudi files in front of the same committees in the same week: one that arms the Kingdom against Iran now, and one that Sherman argues arms it in a different sense a decade from now. A member who wants to register displeasure with the second has just been handed a vote on the first.
The administration is betting that a Congress fighting an unpopular Iran conflict will not deny munitions to the ally absorbing Iranian strikes, and that the arms vote will drag the nuclear vote along behind it. That is a sound read of the arithmetic and a poor read of the sequencing risk: a disapproval resolution on the bombs is the cheapest way for Democrats to attack the nuclear deal without owning the word “nuclear”. For Riyadh the package is welcome but secondary; the 123 text is the structural prize, and the Kingdom should want the two files separated, not bundled. Watch whether any Republican co-sponsors Sherman’s resolution, and whether the JDAM notification draws its own resolution within the review window; a resolution on the bombs is the tell that the nuclear deal is in trouble.